Apto vs Dealpath: which is better for CRE?

Both are established cre deal & pipeline management software options; the right choice depends on firm type, asset mix, and stack fit. The comparison table on this page sets out pricing model, asset-class coverage, integrations, and vendor status side by side — verified 2026-08-22, with no paid placement influencing either profile.

Do Apto and Dealpath publish pricing?

Apto: CRM + Deal Management ~$129/user/mo (starts at $99/mo for base CRM); ~$890/mo for 10 users. Dealpath: no public pricing — expect a sales process.

Apto vs Dealpath

CRE Deal & Pipeline Management Software · Verified 2026-08-22 · No paid placement

Apto

CRM and deal management built for commercial real estate brokers

Historically a favorite broker CRM, but buyers evaluating it today should really be evaluating Buildout CRM, since Apto is being absorbed there.

Dealpath

Deal management platform for institutional real estate pipelines

Institutional acquisitions teams that need pipeline visibility, task/approval workflows and reporting across deal stages — explicitly NOT a financial modeling tool; it tracks deals and documents, it doesn't build DCFs, so it's typically paired with Argus/Rockport/Archer rather than replacing them.

	Apto	Dealpath
Pricing model	Subscription	Enterprise / quote-based
Public pricing	CRM + Deal Management ~$129/user/mo (starts at $99/mo for base CRM); ~$890/mo for 10 users	Not published
Asset classes	Office, Retail, Industrial, Mixed	All
Built for	Brokers	Pe Funds, Reits, Lenders
Integrations	Apto Property Sites, standard CRM data migration tooling	—
Status notes	founded_year: 2013; acquisitions: ACQUIRED by Buildout — being repackaged/merged into Buildout CRM, standalone future uncertain; shutdown_risk: moderate — brand is being sunset/merged post-acquisition; treat as a legacy name pointing to Buildout CRM going forward	None
Last verified	2026-08-22	2026-08-22

What the data says

Apto publishes pricing (CRM + Deal Management ~$129/user/mo (starts at $99/mo for base CRM); ~$890/mo for 10 users) while Dealpath is quote-only — if procurement speed matters, that transparency is a practical edge.
Apto covers Office, Retail, Industrial, Mixed where Dealpath does not list coverage.
Factor in Apto's status: founded_year: 2013; acquisitions: ACQUIRED by Buildout — being repackaged/merged into Buildout CRM, standalone future uncertain; shutdown_risk: moderate — brand is being sunset/merged post-acquisition; treat as a legacy name pointing to Buildout CRM going forward

All Apto alternatives → All Dealpath alternatives → Browse all cre deal & pipeline management software →

Frequently asked questions

Apto vs Dealpath: which is better for CRE?: Both are established cre deal & pipeline management software options; the right choice depends on firm type, asset mix, and stack fit. The comparison table on this page sets out pricing model, asset-class coverage, integrations, and vendor status side by side — verified 2026-08-22, with no paid placement influencing either profile.
Do Apto and Dealpath publish pricing?: Apto: CRM + Deal Management ~$129/user/mo (starts at $99/mo for base CRM); ~$890/mo for 10 users. Dealpath: no public pricing — expect a sales process.