Every active announcement, one square each
Solid squares have a record of power or an issued permit. Round ones are gigawatt-scale. Hover or tab for the campus.
Moraine Research · Third edition
Developers have announced 218.1 GW at 252 US campuses that are not withdrawn or paused; we found no utility filing, issued permit or SEC disclosure of power for 129 of them, which carry 115.1 GW. 122 of the 129 first appear in public records in 2025 or 2026.
Records found in public sources as of October 9, 2026. A record our search missed can exist, and this is not a finding on whether any project gets built.
By Jeff Axelrod, Moraine Research · · Data as of October 9, 2026
This report counts a campus as backed when a utility, regulator, permitting office, government agency or facility inventory has a record that shows power or an issued permit (a service agreement, a large-load request, an air permit for generators, an issued building permit), when the developer discloses contracted power in an SEC filing, or when the operator lists the facility as operating. A rezoning or land-use approval alone does not count; neither do press reports or an operator’s statements about future capacity. Withdrawn, blocked, cancelled and paused projects are left out. “No record found” means our search of public sources as of 2026-10-09 found none; utilities do not publish every large-load agreement. Every campus on the map links to the records found for it.
Others have measured the same gap from the grid side. Wood Mackenzie counted about 1,066 GW of data center load requests to US grid operators (August 2026). SemiAnalysis found that the US capacity flagged as delayed sits almost entirely in announced, pre-construction projects (June 2026). Those counts are anonymous load requests or capacity totals. This report tests each named campus’s own announced figure against the public record and lists the result for every campus.
Solid squares have a record of power or an issued permit. Round ones are gigawatt-scale. Hover or tab for the campus.
218.1 GW announced in all. Each segment is one class of campus, sized by its announced gigawatts.
Size and developer
Share of active announcements with no record of power or an issued permit found, by the developer’s announced size and by the type of operator named in the records. Where no operator is named, a utility or SEC record is harder to match, which raises that group’s share.
Exhibit A
Share of active announcements in each size band. 252 campuses have a developer-announced size.
| Announced size | Campuses | Backed | Not backed | Announced, all | Announced, not backed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 100 MW | 60 | 26 | 34 | 2.5 GW | 1.5 GW |
| 100–499 MW | 97 | 56 | 41 | 23.5 GW | 9.6 GW |
| 500–999 MW | 32 | 16 | 16 | 21.9 GW | 10.2 GW |
| 1 GW and up | 63 | 25 | 38 | 170.2 GW | 93.7 GW |
Exhibit B
Share of active announcements in each developer type, from the operator named in the records.
| Developer type | Campuses | Backed | Not backed | Announced, not backed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer not named, or other | 126 | 33 | 93 | 92.4 GW |
| Colocation and wholesale | 68 | 40 | 28 | 18.9 GW |
| AI cloud and crypto-mining conversions | 44 | 38 | 6 | 2.7 GW |
| Hyperscalers | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1.1 GW |
Announced MW, one scale. Left: no record of power. Right: backed.
Three findings
By record type (a campus can have several): permit, construction or operation on record, 84; utility power contracted, 31; utility power requested, 17; critical IT in a filing, 21; permitted generators, 17; on-site generation, 6. 49 of the 252 announcements are for campuses already operating. 5 of the 129 without a record match an unnamed utility load request by place and size only; those matches are not counted. A further 44 announcements were withdrawn, blocked, cancelled or paused and are left out.
97 first appear in 2026 and 25 in 2025, by the year of the campus’s first dated public record of any kind. A recent announcement may not have a utility filing or permit yet, so this finding mostly describes announcements made in the past two years. The data cannot show whether older announcements are backed more often: the news sources date few announcements before late 2025, and a backed campus is often dated by its own permit.
A rezoning, special use or development approval shows a project has a site; it does not show it has power. 25 of the 129 hold a land-use approval and 19 have one on file. 63 are known only from the press. The other 22 have a stage set by an operator or press record, or no stage set.
Moratoriums
SemiAnalysis mapped 300+ local moratoriums, found about 20 GW of capacity inside a restricted boundary and about 1,525 MW actually delayed locally, or 2.3 GW including New York’s executive order; it measures MW, and this report counts campuses. Our count of instruments, the campuses inside them and what each moratorium means for them: section 07.
For underwriting
Before pricing land on proximity to a planned campus, check for a utility filing or an issued permit; a rezoning shows a site, not power. Each campus on the map links to the records found for it.
Ask for a utility service agreement, an issued air or building permit, or a contracted-power disclosure in an SEC filing. Treat a press figure, an investor deck or a megawatt total on a developer website as unverified. The map marks which kind of record backs each campus.
For an entitled site, the record to produce is a utility agreement or an issued permit: 44 of the 129 announcements with no record of power found already hold a land-use filing or approval. Check the moratorium map (section 07) before buying inside a county or town that has one.
The finding, campus by campus
Exhibit C lists the 15 largest announcements with no record of power found, Exhibit D the 10 largest with one and the record type that backs each, and Exhibit E the split by state.
| Campus | Developer | State | Announced MW | Stage on record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creekstone Delta Gigasite | Creekstone Energy | Utah | 10,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Valar Atomics Project Beehive | Valar Atomics | Utah | 9,600 | Entitlement filed |
| Stratos Project Area (MIDA) | O’Leary Digital | Utah | 9,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| New Mexico AI data center campus (Lea County option) | New ERA Energy & Digital | New Mexico | 7,000 | Stage not established |
| Data center, Encinal | Not named | Texas | 5,000 | Announced (press only) |
| STAK Energy North Slope campus land lease | Stak Energy | Alaska | 3,000 | Site control or codename only |
| TECfusions Upper Burrell, Township Of | TECfusions | Pennsylvania | 3,000 | Stage not established |
| Carlyle El Paso | Carlyle | Texas | 3,000 | Announced (press only) |
| Prometheus Hyperscale Pecos | Prometheus Hyperscale | Texas | 2,500 | Announced (press only) |
| Quantm Group Covington Township | Quantm Group | Pennsylvania | 2,200 | Announced (press only); matches an unnamed utility load request (not counted) |
| Starwood Digital Ventures data center | Starwood Digital Ventures | West Virginia | 2,160 | Announced (press only) |
| Rubix Data Centers Russell | Rubix Data Centers | Kentucky | 2,000 | Announced (press only) |
| Aligned Shippingport PA (PIT-01 / Project Phoenix) | Aligned | Pennsylvania | 2,000 | Under construction or partly energized |
| Tract Lockhart | Tract | Texas | 2,000 | Announced (press only) |
| Tract Buckeye Technology Park | Tract | Arizona | 1,800 | Approved or incentive granted |
Read: the largest announced figures with no record of power found (see the definition), as of 2026-10-09. It is not a finding on whether a project gets built. Announced MW is the developer’s figure, or the figure in the press report that announced the project. Stage on record shows any land-use filing; a construction or permit stage here rests on an operator statement or a press report. Source: Moraine US data center dataset; open each campus on the map for the records found.
| Campus | Developer | State | Announced MW | Backed by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Matador (Amarillo TX) | Fermi America | Texas | 11,000 | on-site generation; utility power requested |
| PORTS-Pike Technology Campus | SB Energy | Ohio | 10,000 | utility power contracted |
| Monarch Cloud Campus | Nscale | West Virginia | 8,000 | permitted generators; critical IT in a filing; on-site generation; permit, construction or operation on record |
| GW Ranch Energy Center (Amazon GW Ranch campus) | Amazon (AWS) | Texas | 7,650 | permit, construction or operation on record |
| Big Sky Digital Infrastructure Campus | Quantica Infrastructure | Montana | 7,235 | utility power requested |
| Meta data center - Richland Parish | Meta | Louisiana | 5,000 | permitted generators; permit, construction or operation on record |
| Stargate Port Washington WI | Vantage | Wisconsin | 3,500 | permit, construction or operation on record; utility power requested |
| Project Camellia | OpenAI / Stargate | Georgia | 3,200 | critical IT in a filing; utility power contracted |
| Matagorda County site (HIF) | MARA | Texas | 2,000 | utility power contracted |
| Southeast Wyoming campus (Crusoe/Tallgrass) | Crusoe | Wyoming | 1,800 | on-site generation; permit, construction or operation on record; utility power contracted |
Backing records are listed by type. The MW in a backing record is shown on the map by its own type and is never netted against the announced figure. Source: Moraine US data center dataset.
| State | Announced campuses | Backed | Not backed | Not backed, % | Announced, not backed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 60 | 32 | 28 | 47% | 22.3 GW |
| Virginia | 20 | 9 | 11 | 55% | 6.4 GW |
| Georgia | 15 | 10 | 5 | 33% | 2 GW |
| Pennsylvania | 14 | 3 | 11 | 79% | 13.1 GW |
| Arizona | 7 | 6 | 1 | 14% | 1.8 GW |
| Illinois | 7 | 4 | 3 | 43% | 2.6 GW |
| North Carolina | 7 | 4 | 3 | 43% | 0.5 GW |
| Utah | 7 | 0 | 7 | 100% | 31.3 GW |
| Alabama | 6 | 4 | 2 | 33% | 2.7 GW |
| California | 6 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 0.4 GW |
| Kentucky | 6 | 2 | 4 | 67% | 4.3 GW |
| Wyoming | 6 | 4 | 2 | 33% | 2 GW |
| Nevada | 5 | 3 | 2 | 40% | 1.1 GW |
| Oregon | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 0 GW |
| South Carolina | 5 | 1 | 4 | 80% | 1.4 GW |
Source: Moraine US data center dataset.
The data
The finding above covers 252 announcements. The sections below cover all 3,790 campuses: stage, power, metros, states, withdrawals and moratoriums.
Interactive map
The dataset covers 3,790 campuses in 50 states plus PR and DC; 976 are confirmed by two or more independent source types, and 2,236 buildings of 20,000 square feet or more sit at their record locations (1,180 campuses). 501 projects are known only from a press announcement.
Each dot is a campus, colored by stage. Open a campus to see the public records behind it, with links. Filter by stage, operator type, state and reported power. Hollow markers are approximate positions (988 campuses placed at a town center). Network and carrier facilities are a separate layer, off by default.
01 · The pipeline by stage
1,686 campuses are operating (44%) and 797 are at an earlier stage. Each campus sits at the highest stage any of its public records proves, from a codename or land option up to an operating facility. 113 are under construction or partly energized and 219 hold a permit. 734 campuses appear in an inventory or news report but have no record that sets a stage; they are counted in totals and shown on the map, but not in the pipeline. A further 501 projects are known only from a press announcement, with no filing found (Exhibit 1c); they are also kept out of the pipeline.
Source: Moraine US data center dataset, from public records (see Method).
| Stage | Campuses |
|---|---|
| 8 · Operating | 1,686 |
| 7–6 · Under construction or partly energized | 113 |
| 5 · Permitted | 219 |
| 4 · Approved or incentive granted | 273 |
| 3 · Entitlement filed | 99 |
| 2 · Utility power requested | 84 |
| 1–0 · Site control or codename only | 9 |
| Stage not established | 734 |
| Announced in the press only | 501 |
| Withdrawn, blocked or paused | 72 |
| Stage | What proves it | Campuses |
|---|---|---|
| 8 · Operating | Facility inventory, operator disclosure, active EPA registration or operating permit | 1,686 |
| 7 · Partly energized | Operator or utility states partial energization | 113 |
| 6 · Under construction | Construction visible in imagery, a construction start in a filing, or an OpenStreetMap construction tag | ↑ |
| 5 · Permitted | Air or building permit issued, or construction stormwater coverage that names a data center building (not coverage for site work, a substation or a line; not a pending application) | 219 |
| 4 · Approved or incentive granted | Rezoning or special use approved, executed utility agreement, or tax incentive certified | 273 |
| 3 · Entitlement filed | Rezoning, special use, DRI, CEQA or SEPA filing | 99 |
| 2 · Utility power requested | Large-load request, queue entry or letter of intent at a utility or grid operator | 84 |
| 1 · Site control | Land purchase, option or entity formation tied to the project | 9 |
| 0 · Codename only | — | ↑ |
| Announced | A developer or official announced the project in the press; no public filing has been found yet. | 501 |
| Stage not established | Listed in an inventory or news report; no record proves a stage. | 734 |
| Withdrawn, blocked or paused | A record shows the project withdrawn, blocked, cancelled, paused or under a moratorium. Projects known only from the press are counted under Announced. | 72 |
Each record proves one stage; a campus takes the highest stage among its records. Stages 7 and 6, and 1 and 0, are counted together (↑). Dates on the map are the date of that record.
Source: news reports, matched to the campus register by place, operator and project name.
| State | Announced projects |
|---|---|
| Texas | 59 |
| Pennsylvania | 40 |
| Virginia | 35 |
| Georgia | 26 |
| Indiana | 20 |
| Michigan | 20 |
| Missouri | 19 |
| Ohio | 19 |
| North Carolina | 18 |
| Kentucky | 17 |
| Oklahoma | 17 |
| Florida | 15 |
| Kansas | 15 |
| Arizona | 12 |
| California | 11 |
02 · Power
Power figures are reported in 7 different ways, and each is shown on its own. A utility contract, a utility request, a critical IT load, a generator permit and a developer’s announcement measure different things, often for the same campus, so they are never added together. 201 campuses have a stated critical IT load, 118 a contracted utility figure and 107 a utility request. Announced figures are the developer’s claim.
| Type | What it measures | Campuses with a figure | Of those, on a third-party or SEC record | Largest single figure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utility power contracted | Capacity under a signed utility service or supply agreement. | 118 | 66 | 3,210 MW |
| Utility power requested | Load requested from a utility in a filing or queue; a request is not a commitment. | 107 | 95 | 2,160 MW |
| Critical IT load | Power available to servers, as stated in a permit, filing or operator record. | 201 | 34 | 3,210 MW |
| Total facility power | Power for the whole facility, including cooling, as stated in a record. | 46 | 26 | 1,000 MW |
| Backup generator nameplate | Nameplate rating of permitted backup generators (air permits). Not a measure of load. | 249 | 220 | 1,761 MW |
| On-site prime generation | Generation that runs as the primary power source on site. | 33 | 23 | 11,679.3 MW |
| Announced by the developer | The developer’s or operator’s stated size in a press release or presentation. A claim, not a filing. | 296 | none (developer claims) | 11,000 MW |
Read: some contracted, requested and IT figures come from press reports or operator statements rather than a utility, regulator, permit or SEC record; the fourth column counts those that rest on a record. Source: Moraine US data center dataset. Each type is read from its own records; types are not added together.
A figure marked * comes from a press report or operator statement, not a utility, regulator, permit or SEC record.
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, contracted | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Camellia | OpenAI / Stargate | GA | 3,210 | Entitlement filed |
| Matagorda County site (HIF) | MARA | TX | 2,000 | Site control or codename only |
| Kiowa OK campus | IREN | OK | 1,600 | Stage not established |
| Helios data center campus | Galaxy | TX | 1,600 | Operating |
| T5 Data Centers Grayslake | T5 Data Centers | IL | 1,550 * | Announced (press only) |
| Google data center - Columbia County, Georgia | GA | 1,400 | Entitlement filed | |
| OpenAI Stargate Michigan | Oracle | MI | 1,400 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Sweetwater 1 | IREN | TX | 1,400 | Stage not established |
| Stargate Saline Township MI | OpenAI / Stargate | MI | 1,383 | Withdrawn, blocked or paused |
| Crusoe Abilene (Stargate) | Crusoe | TX | 1,200 * | Operating |
Capacity under a signed utility service or supply agreement. 118 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 39,533.4 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, requested | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starwood Digital Ventures data center | Starwood Digital Ventures | WV | 2,160 * | Announced (press only) |
| St. Lawrence Infrastructure 1 | Not named | NY | 1,935 | Utility power requested |
| PPL customer facility, Washingtonville PA (Jerseytown) | Not named | PA | 1,500 | Utility power requested |
| PPL customer facility, Berwick PA (Beach Haven) | Not named | PA | 1,500 | Utility power requested |
| OpenAI Stargate Michigan | Oracle | MI | 1,400 | Approved or incentive granted |
| AES Ohio data center request near Eldean Sub, Piqua OH | Not named | OH | 1,400 | Utility power requested |
| AES Ohio data center request near Stuart Sub, Adams County OH | Not named | OH | 1,300 | Utility power requested |
| Stargate Port Washington WI | Vantage | WI | 1,300 | Under construction or partly energized |
| Data center | Not named | IN | 1,200 * | Announced (press only) |
| PPL customer facility, Archbald PA (Callender Gap) | Not named | PA | 1,200 | Utility power requested |
Load requested from a utility in a filing or queue; a request is not a commitment. 107 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 40,386.6 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, critical IT | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Camellia | OpenAI / Stargate | GA | 3,210 | Entitlement filed |
| Monarch Cloud Campus | Nscale | WV | 1,800 | Under construction or partly energized |
| Google data center - Columbia County, Georgia | GA | 1,400 | Entitlement filed | |
| Vantage Frontier | Vantage | TX | 1,400 * | Site control or codename only |
| CloudHQ LC Campus | Digital Realty | VA | 1,256 * | Withdrawn, blocked or paused |
| Project Arrowhead | Not named | GA | 1,250 | Entitlement filed |
| Data center, Cave City | Not named | KY | 1,200 * | Announced (press only) |
| EdgeCore Louisa County | EdgeCore | VA | 1,100 * | Entitlement filed |
| Stargate Port Washington WI | Vantage | WI | 902 * | Under construction or partly energized |
| Stargate Milam County TX (SB Energy) | OpenAI / Stargate | TX | 753 | Stage not established |
Power available to servers, as stated in a permit, filing or operator record. 201 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 34,193.3 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, total facility | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monarch Data Center PUD | Copia Power | NV | 1,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Rockdale Facility | Riot | TX | 700 | Operating |
| Rockdale TX datacenter | BTDR | TX | 563 | Operating |
| Vantage Aurora | Vantage | CO | 500 * | Announced (press only) |
| Core Scientific Muskogee | Core Scientific | OK | 440 * | Operating |
| Riot Corsicana | Riot | TX | 400 | Operating |
| Novva Mesa AZ campus | Novva | AZ | 300 * | Permitted |
| MARA Granbury Data Center | MARA | TX | 300 | Operating |
| Barber Lake | TX | 300 | Under construction or partly energized | |
| Core Scientific Pecos | Core Scientific | TX | 300 * | Operating |
Power for the whole facility, including cooling, as stated in a record. 46 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 8,800.4 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, generator nameplate | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTS Glendale I | QTS | AZ | 1,761 | Operating |
| QTS Richmond (RIC1) | QTS | VA | 1,306.4 | Operating |
| Microsoft Goodyear Airpark Campus | Microsoft | AZ | 1,139 | Operating |
| IB10 Hermosa Ranch | IB10 HERMOSA RANCH LLC | AZ | 1,046 | Permitted |
| Amazon Data Services Inc - Madison Mega Site | Amazon (AWS) | MS | 896.5 | Permitted |
| Cumulus Group LLC Data Center | WV | 792 | Permitted | |
| Digital Western Lands LLC | Digital Realty | VA | 791.5 | Permitted |
| Digital Realty IAD53 | Digital Realty | VA | 789.2 | Operating |
| Sdc Atla, LLC | Not named | GA | 787.5 | Permitted |
| CloudHQ LC Campus | Digital Realty | VA | 784.1 | Withdrawn, blocked or paused |
Nameplate rating of permitted backup generators (air permits). Not a measure of load. 249 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 50,127.9 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, on-site prime | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Matador (Amarillo TX) | Fermi America | TX | 11,679.3 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Homer City Redevelopment LLC Homer City | Homer City Redevelopment LLC | PA | 4,400 * | Announced (press only) |
| Project Jupiter | OpenAI / Stargate | NM | 2,500 * | Under construction or partly energized |
| TransGas Development Systems LLC, Adams Fork Harless Data Center | Not named | WV | 2,459.8 | Permitted |
| Monarch Cloud Campus | Nscale | WV | 2,160 | Under construction or partly energized |
| Southeast Wyoming campus (Crusoe/Tallgrass) | Crusoe | WY | 2,100 | Under construction or partly energized |
| Nexus Data Centers | NEXUS HUBBARD POWER, LLC | TX | 1,600 * | Permitted |
| Port of Victoria / Calhoun County campus (Blue Energy nuclear) | Crusoe | TX | 1,500 * | Stage not established |
| Base Electron gas generation for Polaris Forge 3 (planned) | APLD | ND | 1,200 | Stage not established |
| Crusoe Abilene (Stargate) | Crusoe | TX | 900 * | Operating |
Generation that runs as the primary power source on site. 33 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 33,511.2 MW (this type only).
| Campus | Operator | State | MW, announced | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Matador (Amarillo TX) | Fermi America | TX | 11,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| PORTS-Pike Technology Campus | SB Energy | OH | 10,000 | Entitlement filed |
| Creekstone Delta Gigasite | Creekstone Energy | UT | 10,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Valar Atomics Project Beehive | Valar Atomics | UT | 9,600 | Entitlement filed |
| Stratos Project Area (MIDA) | O’Leary Digital | UT | 9,000 | Approved or incentive granted |
| Monarch Cloud Campus | Nscale | WV | 8,000 | Under construction or partly energized |
| GW Ranch Energy Center (Amazon GW Ranch campus) | Amazon (AWS) | TX | 7,650 | Permitted |
| Big Sky Digital Infrastructure Campus | Quantica Infrastructure | MT | 7,235 | Utility power requested |
| New Mexico AI data center campus (Lea County option) | New ERA Energy & Digital | NM | 7,000 | Stage not established |
| Meta data center - Richland Parish | Meta | LA | 5,000 | Under construction or partly energized |
The developer’s or operator’s stated size in a press release or presentation. A claim, not a filing. 296 campuses report this type; their figures sum to 238,877.5 MW (this type only). Announced by the developer or operator; not a utility or permit figure.
03 · Estimated critical IT load
Estimate: 10,586.6 MW of critical IT load across 912 campuses that do not state one (estimated range 4,774.3 MW to 19,383.8 MW). This is a Moraine estimate, not a reported figure, and it is never added to the stated power figures in the section above.
The estimate multiplies each campus’s building footprint (Overture Maps building footprints at the campus’s record locations, in square feet) by the watts per square foot observed at operating campuses that state both a critical IT load and a footprint. The low, middle and high estimates use the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile of that density.
The estimates for colocation campuses use the colocation density (85 campuses). Hyperscale and all other campuses use the national density (92 campuses), because too few hyperscale campuses publish both an IT load and a footprint. A footprint counts one floor: multistory buildings and unbuilt phases push the estimate low, and buildings with large non-IT space push it high.
| Basis | Campuses | W/SF, 25th pct. | W/SF, median | W/SF, 75th pct. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colocation campuses | 85 | 22.8 | 45.5 | 83.3 |
| National: hyperscale and other campuses | 92 | 19.6 | 45.5 | 83.3 |
Calibration: operating campuses that state both a critical IT load and an Overture footprint. Estimated values are labelled as estimates and kept apart from the stated MW figures.
04 · Top metros
Washington leads with 427 campuses, 210 of them in the pipeline (26% of the national pipeline). Phoenix has 183, Dallas has 156, Chicago has 151. Metros are 2023 core-based statistical areas, assigned from each campus’s coordinates; 1,777 campuses lie outside the 25 metros listed here.
Source: Moraine US data center dataset; 2023 CBSA delineations.
| Metro | Campuses | Operating | Pipeline | Critical IT MW reported | Campuses reporting IT MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 427 | 102 | 210 | 3,903 | 17 |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 183 | 73 | 27 | 894 | 5 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 156 | 72 | 34 | 1,417 | 19 |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 151 | 65 | 34 | 451.5 | 6 |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 126 | 59 | 29 | 331.6 | 7 |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 123 | 80 | 11 | 130.1 | 8 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 85 | 43 | 10 | 201.5 | 5 |
| Columbus, OH | 64 | 44 | 9 | 252 | 2 |
| Kansas City, MO-KS | 59 | 33 | 5 | 14.8 | 2 |
| Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 54 | 34 | 0 | 567.4 | 10 |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 53 | 31 | 5 | 225.2 | 6 |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 46 | 20 | 3 | 7.5 | 2 |
| Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX | 46 | 15 | 11 | 247.4 | 4 |
| Richmond, VA | 46 | 15 | 14 | 2.8 | 1 |
| Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 43 | 27 | 6 | 221.3 | 3 |
| San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX | 43 | 24 | 11 | 726 | 3 |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 41 | 29 | 3 | 96 | 5 |
| Omaha, NE-IA | 39 | 29 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 38 | 19 | 2 | — | 0 |
| Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 37 | 30 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 |
| Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA | 34 | 22 | 4 | — | 0 |
| Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 31 | 20 | 4 | 133.9 | 4 |
| Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 31 | 20 | 2 | 3.2 | 2 |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 29 | 23 | 2 | 6.7 | 3 |
| Cheyenne, WY | 28 | 13 | 8 | 302 | 1 |
Critical IT MW is the sum of stated critical IT loads only, for the campuses that report one; other power types are not included.
05 · States
Virginia has 249 of the 797 pipeline campuses (31%). Texas has 134 and New York has 57; the three together hold 55%. Campuses are recorded in 50 states and Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. Counts depend on what each state and county publishes (see known gaps).
Source: Moraine US data center dataset.
| State | Campuses | Operating | Pipeline | Under construction | Permitted | Stage not established | Withdrawn or halted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia | 519 | 123 | 249 | 9 | 49 | 81 | 31 |
| Texas | 470 | 180 | 134 | 19 | 40 | 94 | 3 |
| California | 211 | 121 | 17 | 1 | 7 | 61 | 1 |
| Arizona | 198 | 79 | 31 | 7 | 23 | 73 | 3 |
| Georgia | 162 | 63 | 42 | 3 | 25 | 26 | 5 |
| Illinois | 151 | 68 | 33 | 15 | 8 | 33 | 7 |
| Ohio | 140 | 80 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 1 |
| New York | 132 | 59 | 57 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 114 | 41 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| Oregon | 94 | 56 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 0 |
| Indiana | 93 | 34 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 19 | 1 |
| New Jersey | 90 | 58 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Washington | 83 | 44 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 1 |
| Colorado | 79 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 |
| Iowa | 78 | 42 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 0 |
| North Carolina | 78 | 35 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
| Florida | 75 | 48 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 |
| Missouri | 70 | 27 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 1 |
| Minnesota | 66 | 38 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 3 |
| Utah | 56 | 22 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 2 |
| Michigan | 53 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Oklahoma | 53 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
| Nevada | 50 | 22 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 50 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Alabama | 47 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Tennessee | 47 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 42 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| South Carolina | 41 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
| Nebraska | 40 | 30 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Kentucky | 39 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Maryland | 39 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Kansas | 36 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Wyoming | 36 | 16 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Mississippi | 28 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| New Mexico | 27 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 24 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Arkansas | 19 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Idaho | 19 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 19 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Montana | 19 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Delaware | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| Maine | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| West Virginia | 14 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| South Dakota | 13 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| New Hampshire | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hawaii | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Alaska | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Vermont | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Puerto Rico | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rhode Island | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source: Moraine US data center dataset. State from each campus’s coordinates.
06 · Withdrawn, blocked and halted
212 projects on the record were withdrawn, blocked, cancelled, paused or halted by a local moratorium. 103 withdrawn, 82 blocked, 24 paused, 9 moratorium, 5 cancelled. 140 of the 212 are known only from press reports. 45 are in Virginia. A withdrawn case records the end of that application only.
Exhibit 6. Projects withdrawn, blocked, cancelled, paused or under a moratorium
| Project | State | County | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data center | AR | Clark County | withdrawn |
| H5 Data Centers | AZ | Maricopa County | blocked |
| Data center, Goodyear | AZ | Maricopa County | withdrawn |
| Active Infrastructure Chandler | AZ | Maricopa County | blocked |
| TEP special agreement (Energy Supply Agreement) for Beale Infrastructure / Humphrey's Peak | AZ | Pima County | blocked |
| Vermaland La Osa Project | AZ | Pinal County | blocked, withdrawn |
| Data center, El Segundo | CA | — | withdrawn |
| Behring Companies Oakland | CA | Alameda County | moratorium |
| Lot Merger # vacation - Data Center Complex | CA | Imperial County | blocked, moratorium, paused |
| HMC Capital Monterey Park | CA | Los Angeles County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Calistoga | CA | Napa County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Brighton | CO | — | withdrawn |
| Data center, Brighton | CO | Adams County | withdrawn |
| Granite Renewables Sterling | CO | Logan County | moratorium |
| Data center, Waterford | CT | New London County | withdrawn |
| Kent County campus | DE | Kent County | blocked |
| Starwood Digital Ventures Delaware City | DE | New Castle County | blocked |
| Data center, Lecanto | FL | Citrus County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Holder | FL | Citrus County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Indiantown | FL | Martin County | withdrawn |
| Data center | FL | Okeechobee County | blocked |
| Indian River State College Okeechobee | FL | Okeechobee County | cancelled |
| PBA Holdings / WPB Logistics LLC Loxahatchee | FL | Palm Beach County | blocked, withdrawn |
| Data center, Fort Pierce | FL | St. Lucie County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Marietta | GA | — | paused |
| Data center, Athens | GA | Clarke County | blocked |
| Data center, Lovejoy | GA | Clayton County | withdrawn |
| Data center | GA | Coweta County | blocked |
| Data center, Ellenwood | GA | DeKalb County | paused |
| PCC-DeKalb LLC Ellenwood | GA | DeKalb County | blocked |
| Dcb Atlanta West, LLC | GA | Douglas County | withdrawn |
| Lithia Springs Data Center | GA | Douglas County | withdrawn |
| Data center | GA | Douglas County | blocked |
| Data center, Fayetteville | GA | Fayette County | blocked |
| Microsoft Data Center (cco06) | GA | Fulton County | blocked |
| Project Turbo (Hall County) | GA | Hall County | withdrawn |
| Data center | GA | Jones County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Gray | GA | Jones County | withdrawn |
| Bolingbroke Technology Campus | GA | Monroe County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Boise | ID | — | blocked |
| Data center, Pocatello | ID | Bannock County | blocked |
| Data center, Barrington Hills | IL | — | withdrawn |
| Data center, Pekin | IL | — | withdrawn |
| Clean Cloud Energy Mahomet | IL | Champaign County | withdrawn |
| Karis Critical Hoffman Estates | IL | Cook County | withdrawn |
| Karis Critical DuPage campus | IL | DuPage County | blocked |
| DuPage County campus | IL | DuPage County | withdrawn |
| Kane campus | IL | Kane County | blocked |
| C1 Yorkville LLC | IL | Kendall County | withdrawn |
| Hut 8 Logan County campus | IL | Logan County | paused |
| Cloverleaf Infrastructure Troy | IL | Madison County | withdrawn |
| Rochelle Technology Center | IL | Ogle County | blocked |
| CyrusOne Sangamon County, IL | IL | Sangamon County | moratorium |
| Meta data center - Jeffersonville | IN | Clark County | moratorium |
| Data One Frankfort | IN | Clinton County | blocked |
| Data center, Indianapolis | IN | Marion County | withdrawn |
| American Tower Indianapolis | IN | Marion County | withdrawn |
| Beale Infrastructure Gardner | KS | Johnson County | withdrawn |
| DAMAC Edgerton | KS | Johnson County | paused |
| Colossus Data Center Advisors Spring Hill | KS | Johnson County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Cave City | KY | Barren County | blocked |
| Data center, Owensboro | KY | Daviess County | blocked |
| Data center | KY | Meade County | blocked |
| Data center | KY | Mercer County | blocked |
| Data center, Franklin | KY | Simpson County | paused |
| Data center, Shreveport | LA | — | blocked |
| Data center, New Orleans | LA | — | blocked |
| Data center, Salem | MA | — | blocked |
| Markley Lowell | MA | Middlesex County | moratorium |
| Amazon (AWS) Lusby | MD | Calvert County | withdrawn |
| Lerner Enterprises Landover | MD | Prince Georges County | paused |
| Data center, Lewiston | ME | Androscoggin County | blocked |
| Data center, Houlton | ME | Aroostook County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Sanford | ME | York County | paused |
| Data center, Kalkaska | MI | — | withdrawn |
| Data center, Lowell Township | MI | Kent County | withdrawn |
| Microsoft Gaines Township | MI | Kent County | paused |
| Data center, Howell | MI | Livingston County | paused |
| Meta Howell Township | MI | Livingston County | paused |
| Data center, Howell Township | MI | Livingston County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Howell Township | MI | Livingston County | paused |
| Data center, Lyon Township | MI | Oakland County | blocked |
| Stargate Saline Township MI | MI | Washtenaw County | moratorium |
| Thor Equities Augusta Township | MI | Washtenaw County | blocked |
| Wayne County campus | MI | Wayne County | blocked |
| Amazon (AWS) Becker | MN | — | paused |
| Oppidan Apple Valley | MN | Dakota County | blocked |
| Google data center - Pine Island, Minnesota | MN | Goodhue County | paused |
| Irongate Sherburne campus | MN | Sherburne County | blocked |
| Google data center - Hermantown, Minnesota | MN | St. Louis County | moratorium |
| Atmosphere Data Centers St. Joseph | MO | Buchanan County | withdrawn |
| Beltline Energy Pacific | MO | Franklin County | withdrawn |
| Revitalization Unlimited Kansas City | MO | Jackson County | blocked |
| Next Revolution, Ferguson (former Emerson campus) | MO | St. Louis County | blocked |
| Swarm Systems Inc. Marshfield | MO | Webster County | paused |
| Data center, Olive Branch | MS | DeSoto County | blocked |
| Jackson Data Center | MS | Hinds County | paused |
| Krambu Bonner | MT | Missoula County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Apex | NC | — | withdrawn |
| Data center, Raleigh | NC | — | withdrawn |
| Data center, Matthews | NC | — | withdrawn |
| Chatham campus | NC | Chatham County | blocked |
| Energy Storage Solutions Kingsboro | NC | Edgecombe County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Rural Hall | NC | Forsyth County | blocked |
| Data center | NC | Gates County | blocked |
| RadiusDC Raleigh | NC | Wake County | paused |
| Data center, Nottingham | NH | Rockingham County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Nottingham | NH | Rockingham County | withdrawn |
| Data center, New Brunswick | NJ | — | blocked |
| Data center, Monroe Township | NJ | Gloucester County | blocked |
| Data center, Andover Township | NJ | Sussex County | blocked |
| Data center, Socorro | NM | Socorro County | withdrawn |
| Townsite Solar II data center campus | NV | Clark County | blocked, cancelled, paused |
| Skylar Capital Management Henderson | NV | Clark County | withdrawn |
| Thor Equities Urbana | OH | — | blocked |
| Amazon (AWS) Trenton | OH | Butler County | blocked |
| Logistix Hamilton | OH | Butler County | withdrawn |
| Amazon (AWS) data center | OH | Butler County | blocked |
| Lakeland Equity Group Cleveland | OH | Cuyahoga County | blocked |
| Lorain campus | OH | Lorain County | blocked |
| Quantum HPC Norton | OH | Summit County | paused |
| Meta Middleton Township | OH | Wood County | blocked |
| Beale Infrastructure Coweta | OK | Wagoner County | withdrawn |
| Meta data center - Tulsa | OK | Washington County | withdrawn |
| Data center, La Pine | OR | Deschutes County | blocked, withdrawn |
| Roundhouse Digital Infrastructure Cascade Locks | OR | Hood River County | blocked |
| Verrus Salem | OR | Marion County | blocked |
| Data center, East Vincent | PA | Chester County | blocked |
| Mudiita Infra Ransom Township | PA | Lackawanna County | blocked, withdrawn |
| Data center, Newton Township | PA | Lackawanna County | blocked |
| Data center, Archbald | PA | Lackawanna County | blocked |
| Data center, Columbia | PA | Lancaster County | blocked |
| Data center, South Annville Township | PA | Lebanon County | withdrawn |
| Data center | PA | Lehigh County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Hazle Township | PA | Luzerne County | blocked |
| Data center, Granville Township | PA | Mifflin County | blocked |
| Data center, Upper Merion | PA | Montgomery County | blocked |
| Talen Energy data center | PA | Montour County | blocked |
| Data center, Peach Bottom Township | PA | York County | paused |
| Data center, Smithfield | RI | Providence County | blocked |
| MYRA - Building 1 | SC | Marion County | cancelled, withdrawn |
| Spartanburg campus | SC | Spartanburg County | blocked |
| TigerDC Spartanburg | SC | Spartanburg County | withdrawn |
| Colossus Memphis TN | TN | Shelby County | moratorium |
| CyrusOne Houston, TX HOU3-4 | TX | — | cancelled |
| Data center, Prosper | TX | — | withdrawn |
| Barrio Tyler | TX | — | blocked |
| Data center | TX | Bastrop County | paused |
| ONMINE Killeen | TX | Bell County | blocked |
| Data center, Brownsville | TX | Cameron County | withdrawn |
| RagingWire TX1 - NTT | TX | Dallas County | withdrawn |
| Data center, San Marcos | TX | Hays County | blocked |
| Diode Ventures data center | TX | Henderson County | withdrawn |
| Pacifico Energy Acton | TX | Hood County | blocked |
| MSB Global (with City of Sulphur Springs) Sulphur Springs | TX | Hopkins County | paused |
| Data center, Lubbock | TX | Lubbock County | withdrawn |
| Viridien Brenham | TX | Washington County | blocked |
| Hutto Data Center 3 LLC | TX | Williamson County | withdrawn |
| Blueprint Data Centers Taylor | TX | Williamson County | paused |
| Timpanogos Tech Center East Bay data center (Provo) | UT | — | blocked, withdrawn |
| QTS Slc2 Data Center 1 | UT | Utah County | withdrawn |
| Penzance Fredericksburg | VA | — | blocked |
| Data center, Concord | VA | Campbell County | blocked |
| Data center | VA | Chesterfield County | blocked |
| World Gate sub (data center complex, Fairfax) | VA | Fairfax County | withdrawn |
| Headwaters Site Development Catlett Station | VA | Fauquier County | withdrawn |
| GigaLand LLC Fauquier campus | VA | Fauquier County | withdrawn |
| Crusoe data center | VA | Franklin County | withdrawn |
| Mountain Road Technology Park | VA | Hanover County | blocked |
| Data center | VA | Hanover County | blocked |
| Data center, Beaverdam | VA | Hanover County | paused |
| Centra Logistics data center | VA | Henrico County | blocked |
| Data center, Varina | VA | Henrico County | withdrawn |
| Cologix ASH2 | VA | Loudoun County | blocked, withdrawn |
| Digital Realty IAD12 | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Amazon IAD120 | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Amazon IAD144 | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Amazon IAD78 | VA | Loudoun County | blocked |
| CloudHQ LC Campus | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| IAD-03 Data Center | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Yondr Loudoun County VA adjacent parcel pipeline | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Loudoun Co. DC pipeline application STPL-2023-0007 (PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NA CORP) | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Severn sub (data center complex, Loudoun) | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| SAMUELS MILL ASSEMBLAGE | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Moran Road Data Center | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| See Legi-2025-0034 For Timeline, Workflow And Documents | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Sterling | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Sterling | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Cit Guilford Drive LLC | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Transdulles Center | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Global Plaza | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Ashburn | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Arcola Center Project | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Transdulles Center | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Sterling | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Aligned Ashburn | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Sterling | VA | Loudoun County | withdrawn |
| Amazon Data Services - Northeast Creek Tech Campus | VA | Louisa County | withdrawn |
| QTS Manassas DC5 | VA | Prince William County | withdrawn |
| Compass Data Centers (REZ2022-00036) | VA | Prince William County | withdrawn |
| QTS Gainesville | VA | Prince William County | cancelled |
| Data center | VA | Prince William County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Gainesville | VA | Prince William County | blocked |
| Data center, Bristow | VA | Prince William County | blocked |
| Data center | VA | Stafford County | withdrawn |
| ColoCrossing SEA1 | WA | King County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Menomonie | WI | — | blocked |
| QTS Deforest | WI | Dane County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Cassville | WI | Grant County | withdrawn |
| Data center, Cassville | WI | Grant County | blocked |
| Microsoft Caledonia | WI | Racine County | withdrawn |
Source: Moraine US data center dataset; open the campus on the map for its records.
07 · Local moratoriums
734 local moratorium instruments on data centers, each verified against its source: 470 enacted, 53 extended, 156 proposed, 32 rejected, 13 expired, 5 lifted, 5 replaced. 523 are recorded as in force (enacted or extended). That is an upper bound: 174 carry no enactment or expiry date, so a short pause that has lapsed can still be counted, and 3 carry an expiry date before 2026-10-09. The most in force are in Michigan (46), Ohio (41), Georgia (33), North Carolina (32), Wisconsin (26).
272 campuses in the dataset sit inside the boundary of a moratorium in force. 187 are operating, which a moratorium does not reach. 14 hold an approval dated before the moratorium was enacted. 12 may need an approval while it is in force (Exhibit 7b). 59 have no public record that sets a stage.
Source: Moraine compilation of local government records and news; each instrument verified against its source.
| Reading | Campuses |
|---|---|
| Operating; a moratorium does not reach existing facilities | 187 |
| Holds an approval dated before enactment | 14 |
| May need an approval while the moratorium is in force | 12 |
| Stage not established | 59 |
| Campus | Operator | County | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data center, Monterey Park | Not named | Los Angeles County | CA |
| Gilroy Data Center | Not named | Santa Clara County | CA |
| Digital Realty - Project Splash | Digital Realty | Clayton County | GA |
| ATL2 Data Center | Not named | Newton County | GA |
| T5@Chicago IV, LP | T5 Data Centers | Lake County | IL |
| Microsoft Corporation - Yellow Facility | Microsoft | Howard County | MD |
| Iron Gate Data Centers - Eagan | Not named | Dakota County | MN |
| Nebius AI Data Center | Nebius | Jackson County | MO |
| Clt 16 12mw Data Center | Not named | Mecklenburg County | NC |
| Data center, Seattle | Not named | King County | WA |
| Data center | Not named | Kittitas County | WA |
| Meta Beaver Dam Data Center | Meta | Dodge County | WI |
A campus is inside a moratorium when its record location falls within the instrument’s boundary. Readings compare the campus’s stage and record dates with the date of enactment.
| State | Date | Action | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | 2026-07-14 | Executive order, for up to one year, pausing state environmental permits for new hyperscale data centers of 50 MW and up. | insideclimatenews.org |
| Texas | 2026-09-21 | Governor’s directive pausing TCEQ permit issuance for data center projects until state grid and water audits are delivered. It expands an Aug. 3 directive that paused data centers advancing through ERCOT’s interconnection process pending an audit. | bracewell.com |
| Oregon | 2026-09-08 | Executive order pausing unapproved requests for state-owned land for data center projects, through 2027-07-01. Private land is not covered. | kptv.com |
Statewide actions are listed apart from the 734 local instruments and are not counted among them. The list is a selection, not a complete record of statewide actions.
How the moratorium test works. Instruments were compiled from local government records and news. Each was verified against its source article or ordinance: confirmed against the source news article, 645; corrected on review (status, date or jurisdiction), 64; confirmed by a separate web check of the jurisdiction’s record, 21; confirmed against the ordinance or official record, 4. Reports with only a headline were not published. Boundaries are Census 2023 counties, places and county subdivisions. A county instrument is applied only to unincorporated land unless it says otherwise. Campuses placed only at a town center are left out of the test.
About 30,000 public records were collected by automated feeds with no API keys and no paid data. Records are joined into campuses by position, operator and project codename, so a permit, a utility filing and a press report for the same site count once. 976 campuses (26%) are confirmed by two or more independent source types. Recall was measured against independent public lists of data centers.
Each record proves one stage: 0 codename only, 1 site control, 2 utility power requested, 3 entitlement filed, 4 approved or incentive granted, 5 permitted, 6 under construction, 7 partly energized, 8 operating. A campus takes the highest stage among its records. Construction stormwater coverage proves a permit only when it names a data center building, and an air permit still at the application step proves a filing, not a permit. Withdrawn, blocked, cancelled, paused and moratorium are recorded as status, not stage. Stage is what a record proves, not a schedule.
Three audits set what is published. The first sampled 100 campuses across 9 evidence classes and checked each against Esri satellite imagery and its source records: 33 confirmed, 39 plausible (real record, imagery inconclusive), 14 not a data center, 13 unverifiable, 1 wrong place. The high-error classes (rezoning-only, FAA-only, Overture-only and air/ECHO-only) were held back and reviewed record by record. In the second, 2,464 held campuses were reviewed from their record text, and a 40-campus imagery check tested the promotions. Only high-confidence promotions are published. In the third, 751 campuses still held were checked against imagery (Exhibit 10): campuses with a data center visible were published, and plausible ones only when the record is a regulator’s data-center filing. 988 campuses are placed at a town center and drawn as hollow markers.
On 55 campuses we searched utility, regulator, permit and SEC records by hand. Of 40 marked as having no record of power, 8 had one that the automated search missed, and 5 were ambiguous. Of 15 marked as backed, 4 rested on a record that does not show power or an issued permit, and 3 were ambiguous. 11 of those 12 errors are corrected in this edition. 4 of the 8 missed records sat on a second row for the same campus; such rows are now merged after review. A second check after the corrections, on 40 campuses not checked before, found 2 missed records among 25 marked as having none and 0 unsupported backings among 15 marked as backed (7 ambiguous).
187 network and carrier facilities (carrier hotels, network points of presence) are a separate map layer and are not counted as data center campuses. 107 data center filings with no site location are counted by county (46 county entries in 19 states) but not mapped. Stated MW figures are never adjusted, and MW types are never added together; the estimated critical IT load is labeled and kept apart.
County assessor parcels coded for data center use add sites and confirm existing ones in Loudoun County, VA, Prince William County, VA, Maricopa County, AZ, Franklin County, OH, Utah County, UT, Douglas County, NE, Grant County, WA. Only entity owners are published.
2,236 buildings stand at the record locations of 1,180 campuses, counted from Overture Maps building footprints. A campus with several records can have buildings at more than one location. Footprint square feet are the ground area of those buildings.
Announced: A developer or official announced the project in the press; no public filing has been found yet. 501 projects are at this stage; they are kept out of the pipeline count.
Some states offer no anonymous search of air permits, and many local governments publish no searchable agendas, so early-stage projects there are undercounted. Large-load requests to PJM utilities are not published by customer; PJM planning slides show unnamed loads, which this report matches by place only and does not count as backing. Planned projects reported only in the news carry the announced stage until a filing appears. No street addresses or personal names are published. Not investment advice.
| Evidence class | Confirmed or plausible | Not a data center |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-source campuses | 88% | 0% |
| Operator, utility or incentive records | 100% | 0% |
| PeeringDB only | 92% | 8% |
| Water or stormwater permit only | 80% | 0% |
| OpenStreetMap only | 70% | 10% |
| Rezoning only | 70% | 30% |
| FAA filing only | 58% | 33% |
| Overture place name only | 50% | 33% |
| Air permit or ECHO only | 40% (50% unverifiable) | 10% |
Overall: Confirmed 33; Plausible (real record, imagery inconclusive) 39; Not a data center 14; Unverifiable 13; Wrong place 1. Plausible = a real record where imagery is inconclusive, such as space inside a multi-tenant building or bare land for a planned site. Classes held back after this audit: rezoning-only, FAA-only, Overture-only and air/ECHO-only.
| Result | Campuses |
|---|---|
| Data center facility | 1,356 |
| Not a data center | 576 |
| Data-center-related, not a facility (substations, ordinances) | 115 |
| Unsure | 417 |
Imagery check of 40 promoted campuses: 20 of 20 high-confidence promotions confirmed or plausible, against 16 of 20 medium-confidence (1 not a data center, 1 point outside the US). Only high-confidence promotions are published.
| Result | Campuses |
|---|---|
| Data center visible (published) | 211 |
| Plausible (published only when the record is a regulator’s data-center filing) | 241 |
| Not a data center | 222 |
| Unverifiable | 77 |
FAQ
We found a public record of power or an issued permit for 123 of 252 active US data center announcements (49%). For the other 129 (51%), carrying 115.1 GW of 218.1 GW announced, we found no utility filing, issued permit or SEC disclosure of power in public sources as of 2026-10-09, including 38 of the 63 announcements of 1 GW or more. 122 of those 129 first appear in public records in 2025 or 2026. Press reports, developer websites and land-use approvals alone do not count as a record of power. 44 withdrawn, blocked, cancelled or paused announcements are left out. This counts records found; it is not a finding on whether a project gets built.
This dataset counts 3,790 US data center campuses from public records as of 2026-10-09: 1,686 operating, 797 in the pipeline (from site control to under construction), 734 with no stage set by a public record, 501 known only from a press announcement (140 of them later reported withdrawn, blocked, cancelled or paused), and 72 withdrawn, blocked or paused with a filing on record. A campus can hold several buildings. 187 network and carrier facilities are counted separately.
Virginia, with 249 of 797 pipeline campuses (31%), followed by Texas (134) and New York (57).
Reported power is kept by type and never added across types. 118 campuses have a contracted utility figure, 107 a utility power request and 201 have a stated critical IT load. 95 of the requests and 66 of the contracted figures rest on a utility, regulator or SEC record; the rest come from press reports or operator statements. The largest request on such a record is 1,935 MW (St. Lawrence Infrastructure 1, New York); the largest contracted figure is 3,210 MW (Project Camellia).
Public records only: facility inventories, operator websites and SEC filings, utility commission dockets and grid-operator queues, federal and state air, water and stormwater permits, FAA obstruction filings, county and city planning cases, state incentive rosters, building footprints and news reports. No paid data or API keys are used.
This dataset has 734 local moratorium instruments on data centers, each verified against its source: 470 enacted, 53 extended, 156 proposed, 32 rejected, 13 expired, 5 lifted, 5 replaced. 523 are recorded as enacted or extended, an upper bound on those in force: 174 of them carry no enactment or expiry date. 272 campuses in the dataset sit inside one; 187 of them are operating and not affected. Statewide actions include New York’s, Texas’s and Oregon’s on data center permits, grid interconnection or state land; that list is not complete.
For 912 campuses that do not state an IT load, the estimate multiplies the building footprint at the campus's record locations by the watts per square foot observed at 92 operating campuses that state both IT load and footprint (25th percentile 19.6, median 45.5, 75th percentile 83.3 W/SF). Estimates are labeled as such and never added to stated figures.
https://morainecre.com/resources/research/us-data-centers Moraine reads offering memoranda, leases and rent rolls and links every number back to its source page, so your team spends its time on the analysis, not the extraction.