Blooma vs Henry

CRE Underwriting & Financial Modeling Software · Verified 2026-08-22 · No paid placement

AI-powered CRE lending and underwriting platform

CRE lenders specifically — automates loan-origination data extraction, credit analysis and underwriting; not built for equity-side acquisitions underwriting.

AI-generated deal decks, OMs and underwriting models for CRE brokers

Brokerage teams who need fast, polished OMs/BOVs/loan packages/pitch decks with a firm-branded underwriting model behind them — a sell-side production tool, not a buy-side diligence/analysis platform. In use at 150+ firms per vendor claims.

Blooma Henry
Pricing model Enterprise / quote-based Subscription
Public pricing Not published Starts at approximately $1,500/month
Asset classes All All
Built for Lenders Brokers
Integrations
Status notes founded_year: 2020; funding: $15M Series A led by Canapi Ventures (with Nyca Partners) funding: $16.5M Series A; launched 'Henry Deal' expansion
Last verified 2026-08-22 2026-08-22

What the data says

  • Henry publishes pricing (Starts at approximately $1,500/month) while Blooma is quote-only — if procurement speed matters, that transparency is a practical edge.
  • Factor in Blooma's status: founded_year: 2020; funding: $15M Series A led by Canapi Ventures (with Nyca Partners)
  • Factor in Henry's status: funding: $16.5M Series A; launched 'Henry Deal' expansion

Frequently asked questions

Blooma vs Henry: which is better for CRE?
Both are established cre underwriting & financial modeling software options; the right choice depends on firm type, asset mix, and stack fit. The comparison table on this page sets out pricing model, asset-class coverage, integrations, and vendor status side by side — verified 2026-08-22, with no paid placement influencing either profile.
Do Blooma and Henry publish pricing?
Blooma: no public pricing — expect a sales process. Henry: Starts at approximately $1,500/month.