Archer vs Blooma
CRE Underwriting & Financial Modeling Software · Verified 2026-08-22 · No paid placement
Data-powered underwriting and acquisitions platform for multifamily
Multifamily-only investors, brokers and lenders who want one-click first-pass underwriting from parsed OMs/T-12s/rent rolls plus a built-in rent/sales comps layer — mixed-asset-class firms will find it too narrow.
AI-powered CRE lending and underwriting platform
CRE lenders specifically — automates loan-origination data extraction, credit analysis and underwriting; not built for equity-side acquisitions underwriting.
| Archer | Blooma | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription | Enterprise / quote-based |
| Public pricing | Not published | Not published |
| Asset classes | Multifamily | All |
| Built for | Pe Funds, Brokers, Lenders | Lenders |
| Integrations | 40+ nationwide comps/data sources | — |
| Status notes | None | founded_year: 2020; funding: $15M Series A led by Canapi Ventures (with Nyca Partners) |
| Last verified | 2026-08-22 | 2026-08-22 |
What the data says
- Archer covers Multifamily where Blooma does not list coverage.
- Factor in Blooma's status: founded_year: 2020; funding: $15M Series A led by Canapi Ventures (with Nyca Partners)
All Archer alternatives →
All Blooma alternatives →
Browse all cre underwriting & financial modeling software →
Frequently asked questions
- Archer vs Blooma: which is better for CRE?
- Both are established cre underwriting & financial modeling software options; the right choice depends on firm type, asset mix, and stack fit. The comparison table on this page sets out pricing model, asset-class coverage, integrations, and vendor status side by side — verified 2026-08-22, with no paid placement influencing either profile.
- Do Archer and Blooma publish pricing?
- Archer: no public pricing — expect a sales process. Blooma: no public pricing — expect a sales process.